Skip to main content

Timeline for Oil Cooled vs Water Cooled

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 4, 2016 at 21:52 comment added Moab Actually there are oil cooled engines that use oil in the radiator instead of glycol-water but are usually commercial type engines.
Aug 4, 2016 at 19:01 history tweeted twitter.com/StackMechanics/status/761275933609328640
Aug 4, 2016 at 14:47 vote accept BraveNinja
Aug 4, 2016 at 13:39 comment added Bob Cross All: changed the title to reflect the OP's intent as best I can interpret. Your previous comments may be out of date.
Aug 4, 2016 at 13:38 history edited Bob Cross CC BY-SA 3.0
added 5 characters in body; edited title
Aug 4, 2016 at 13:27 answer added Shobin P timeline score: 8
Aug 3, 2016 at 21:42 answer added Jay Vyas timeline score: 10
Aug 3, 2016 at 21:35 comment added DucatiKiller The implication is water cooled vs. oil cooled IMO. It seems to me there is a very clear distinction.
Aug 3, 2016 at 21:25 comment added Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 This question doesn't make much sense to me. Automotive engines use oil, whether it's "liquid" cooled or not. Cooling is just one of the jobs of oil. Some of the other things it does is reduce friction, lubricate, and clean. I've not heard of oil being used in place of a water-antifreeze based coolant.
Aug 3, 2016 at 21:20 comment added Moab Depends on the application which is most efficient. Most applications water-glygol is more efficient.
Aug 3, 2016 at 20:37 comment added BraveNinja I mean the coolant generally used in cars (the green color liquid) vs oil cooling.
Aug 3, 2016 at 20:12 comment added BraveNinja For a motorcycle engine. And also for a car, if I were ever offered to choose between the two.
Aug 3, 2016 at 20:09 comment added Moab cooling for what? Oil cooling is much more stable than water-glycol systems but costs more.
Aug 3, 2016 at 19:59 history asked BraveNinja CC BY-SA 3.0