0

My three-month-old Subaru Crosstrek was hit in the rear bumper. The body shop that the dealer sent me to says the damage was limited to that one part, but I notice on the estimate that they propose to use (and paint) "parts not made by the original manufacturer". I don't need to cut corners (the other guy's insurance will cover it) so I'm wondering if I should insist on genuine Subaru body parts, or if the non-original parts are entirely equivalent.

  • Probably an opinion-based question, but why bother? You deserve OEM parts at the very least to preserve resale. – SteveRacer Jan 31 '18 at 3:03
1

If the car is three months old then the parts should be original Subaru, not chinesium imports - ie this should be to the same standard as original Subaru to be covered by the existing, and continuing warranty.

I would expect that the dealer should be doing the repair or a body shop accredited by Subaru so that there is no issue in the future.

  • Good point about keeping the vehicle up to the same standard as was warranteed. As it turns out, the verbiage about non-original parts was simply a disclaimer printed on the form. If the parts listed had actually been non-original, that fact would have been individually noted. – Chap Jan 31 '18 at 2:51
  • You need to ask yourself , do I really want to hire a lawyer to fight the insurance company for a few months ? – blacksmith37 Jan 31 '18 at 3:06
  • @blacksmith37 Why not ask the dealer for a written guarantee first ... – Solar Mike Jan 31 '18 at 7:14
  • @Chap good result then, hope they do a really nice job for you. – Solar Mike Jan 31 '18 at 7:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.