I found something interesting on Wikipedia today: a hybrid turbocharger. This is a device that charges a battery with an exhaust gas turbine, and at the same time operates an air compressor using the battery to pack more air into the engine. As a benefit, the turbo lag is eliminated because the direct link between the turbine and the compressor is eliminated.

It seems to me that this device has two independent parts that can be used without each other: the exhaust gas turbine generator and the compressor. You probably need a heftier battery, too, than what is used in conventional vehicles. Thus, in my opinion this device is most suitable to hybrid vehicles.

However, hybrid vehicles have already direct electric boost, so I'm not certain that a compressor could be very beneficial. The turbine generator part, however, seems useful. There is lot of energy in exhaust gases and a turbine generator could recover some of it. In a hybrid vehicle there is good use for the recovered electricity.

So, why no production hybrid vehicles use an exhaust gas turbine generator? Is the technology too immature? Too unreliable for the goal that hybrid vehicles should have greater reliability than conventional vehicles? Or are the potential gains of such exhaust energy recovery so minor that the solution wouldn't pay for itself? Or does the Atkinson cycle used in hybrid engines mean that the exhaust gases don't have as much excess energy than in the case of the Otto cycle?

  • I've read this question a couple of times now and am still not sure about your question. Are you asking why exhaust gas energy isn't converted to or stored as electrical energy?
    – Zaid
    Commented Dec 27, 2015 at 11:28
  • 1
    Yes, that's exactly why I am asking: why there are no devices to convert exhaust gas energy to electrical energy in hybrids that have a use for the elctrical energy.
    – juhist
    Commented Dec 27, 2015 at 11:36
  • 1
    OK, got it. It's because you get more energy for your fuel if you use the exhaust gases for turbocharging the intake side rather than squirrelling it away in a battery. I'm a little busy now, but will post an answer with more details later today.
    – Zaid
    Commented Dec 27, 2015 at 11:42
  • 1
    A fundamental problem with any such scheme is that it restricts exhaust flow. The more electric power it produces, the more it restricts the flow. It's not as if turning a generator that's powering a load takes no energy. Commented Jan 22, 2016 at 17:53
  • While it makes sense in theory and the answers below are noted, in addition to providing backpressure, I guess it also adds complication and there are energy conversion losses going from kinetic -> electric -> kinetic energy. Another question is would it allow a reduction in the engine size/weight compared to a normal turbocharger?
    – nsandersen
    Commented Nov 20, 2020 at 15:43

1 Answer 1


They Exist

I was unable to find any manufacturers that have rolled out this technology into production vehicles but there are several manufacturers that have the baseline technology in R&D

Formula 1

Formula 1 has always been a playground for engineers and with the new rules implemented in 2012 the current platforms are running this technology and recapturing energy from the turbocharger and storing it chemically in batteries. The manufacturers doing this include:

  • Renault/Nissan - Nissan is owned by Renault and they are using an ERS (energy recovery system) on the RB11.

  • Mercedes - The PU106A is currently using the technology as well.

  • Honda - A hybrid platform as well that recovers heat energy from the turbo to be stored as electrical energy.

Additionally, there are other manufactures doing this.

How it works

There are two energy recovery systems. A kinetic system called the MGU-K which is driven off the crankshaft and a heat recovery system via the turbocharger called the MGU-H.

FI Hybrid Engine

enter image description here

MGU-K (Motor Generating Unit Kinetic)

Harvests electricity via a generator off the crankshaft.

What you are interested in

This is the component that harvests energy from the turbocharger.

MGU-H (Motor Generating Unit Heat)

Harvest energy from the turbocharger shaft on deceleration and stores it in the battery. As the turbine is spinning, after it is prespun to act as an ALS (Anti-Lag System) system, it is harvesting energy from the exhaust. Upon deceleration it continues to act in this manner, harvesting energy as an alternator.

Upon application of the throttle the polarity of the alternator can be reversed turning it into an electric motor. When the MGU-H is in this mode of operation it can pre-spin the turbocharger up to 120,000 RPM's to use it as an ARS to spin up the turbo before the vehicle operator applies throttle. This pre-spinning of the turbo prevents turbo lag and charges the intake tract with compressed air/fuel to provide immediate power once throttle is applied.

Formula 1 is well known to be a proving ground for tech. Devices developed in Formula 1 have been ported to production vehicles for years. Active suspension, variable valve timing, aero tech, hybrid tech, you name it, it has a good chance of being made better in the Darwinian world of F1.

The involved manufacturers are adopting this technology now and it will soon begin to appear in hybrid-turbo 4 cylinders initially.

  • 2
    That's pretty cool stuff.
    – Ppoggio
    Commented Dec 27, 2015 at 22:11
  • Here's the Mercedes F1 car playing the Top Gun theme. youtube.com/watch?v=pXIbb8oTwos Commented Dec 27, 2015 at 22:25
  • 1
    That's amazing. There's more there too. lol...I know I'm doing for a bit.
    – Ppoggio
    Commented Dec 28, 2015 at 2:26

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .