Sign up ×
Motor Vehicle Maintenance & Repair Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for mechanics and DIY enthusiast owners of cars, trucks, and motorcycles. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm not sure if this is on topic, but I'd like to know the answer before it comes a repair question.

I have a Y2K Triumph Speed Triple - great bike. First gear comfortably takes to 90km/h. Needless to say, in city riding I have to short-shift out of first but there seems no point in going to second so I go straight to third by double clicking the changer.

Is there any mechanical downside to doing this?

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 9 down vote accepted

nope, not at all. I have a z06 vette and the engine has so much torque that I can easily go from 1st to 5th. Under normal driving I skip gears all the time. Generally transmissions don't really care about which gear you want to use next.

share|improve this answer
But does the a sequential gear box of a motorcycle work differently to the gearbox of a car? Unfortunately, my car is a piece of crap so skipping gears just brings frustration. – dave May 30 '11 at 21:39
I don't know if motorcycle transmissions have something special, but I think all manual gearboxes generally operate on the same principle. All the gears are engaged at all times but one gear rotates independently of the shaft its on. Then there's external mechanism (like synchros) that lock a specific gear with the shaft using splines. Here's a yamaha gearbox:…, and this is one that I rebuilt few years back: Idea seems to be the same – DXM May 30 '11 at 23:01
The car I learned to drive in (Pontiac Sunbird) was so weak that skipping gears was normal operation. You had to wind it out to get up to speed, then skip directly to the tallest gear it could cruise in. 2-4 and 3-5 were real common patterns... :-) – Brian Knoblauch Feb 22 '12 at 19:39
@DXM: there are some key differences between a motorcycle transmission and a typcial manual automobile transmission. For one thing, motorcycle tranmissions have no synchronizers, but more importantly, motorcycle transmissions are sequenital. There's no way to shift straight from first to third, you must go through second on the way. Even if you never release the clutch in second gear, the transmission engaged second gear on the way. To dave: there should be no mechanical downside to shifting as you suggest. – mac Jul 17 '12 at 15:14

I am not a driving expert, but I think it has to do with RPM. If you want to skip gears, make sure the RPM are at the right level or you damage your gears. Again, I am no expert, but I think it is related to RPMs.

share|improve this answer
No problems there, it's a close ratio box with a tall first gear. 60km/h in first would be about 7000 rpm. Double clicking the gear changer takes that down to about 3500 rpm - still within the sweet spot. – dave May 31 '11 at 18:34

My understanding is that as long as you know the gear you're switching into will provide you the torque you need to continue accelerating, you should be fine. In fact, it makes sense to me that you'd actually cause more wear by letting out the clutch, catching the gears, and then pulling it back in. You'd also cause less smooth acceleration due to very slight engine braking (or I just suck at manual).

I'm a computer programmer, not a mechanic (ergo, you should not take any advice from me and probably do the exact opposite!), but on my bike I usually start out in first, shift to third around 20mph depending on how fast I need to accelerate (traffic around here is full of "those" people), and then fifth or sixth.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.